Ransomware Group: DRAGONFORCE

VICTIM NAME: InEar hear the difference

NOTE: No files or stolen information are [exfiltrated/downloaded/taken/hosted/seen/reposted/disclosed] by RedPacket Security. Any legal issues relating to the content of the files should be directed at the attackers directly, not RedPacket Security. This blog is simply posting an editorial news post informing that a company has fallen victim to a ransomware attack. RedPacket Security is in no way affiliated or aligned with any ransomware threat actors or groups and will not host infringing content. The information on this page is fully automated and redacted whilst being scraped directly from the DRAGONFORCE Onion Dark Web Tor Blog page.

AI Generated Summary of the Ransomware Leak Page

On August 21, 2025, a ransomware leak page attributed to the threat group dragonforce lists a victim identified as “InEar hear the difference.” The entry includes a precise post timestamp (2025-08-21 18:39:03.649776) and indicates that a claim URL is present, suggesting a ransom-related notice exists on the page. The metadata shows no downloadable content and no images attached to the page (downloads_present: false; images_count: 0). The industry field is not populated in the dataset, signaling that no explicit industry category is recorded for this entry. Taken together, the page appears to function as a public ransom post rather than a complete incident summary within the provided data.

The accompanying German-language description portrays the target as a German manufacturer of high-quality hearing solutions based in Dieburg. It states that the company develops, produces, and distributes in-ear monitors and audio technology for professional use as well as consumer markets. The description highlights modern manufacturing techniques and in-house support and service, underscoring a long-standing presence in the audio industry. In line with the victim_name, the content frames the entity as an established player in audio hardware rather than focusing on a specific incident beyond the leak entry.

Because the data does not include a clearly stated compromise date or any ransom figures, the post date is used as the primary timestamp for context. There are no images or downloadable materials listed on the leak page, so no screenshots or documents are available for summarisation. The presence of a claim URL combined with the absence of visible content is typical for ransom postings, but the available fields do not provide explicit information about encryption, data exfiltration, or monetary demands in this instance.