Ransomware Group: QILIN

VICTIM NAME: swanforlife[.]com

NOTE: No files or stolen information are [exfiltrated/downloaded/taken/hosted/seen/reposted/disclosed] by RedPacket Security. Any legal issues relating to the content of the files should be directed at the attackers directly, not RedPacket Security. This blog is simply posting an editorial news post informing that a company has fallen victim to a ransomware attack. RedPacket Security is in no way affiliated or aligned with any ransomware threat actors or groups and will not host infringing content. The information on this page is fully automated and redacted whilst being scraped directly from the QILIN Onion Dark Web Tor Blog page.

AI Generated Summary of the Ransomware Leak Page

The leak page associated with swanforlife[.]com is attributed to the ransomware group qiling (qilin) and is dated August 18, 2025. The page presents the target as an insurer operating under a SWAN brand, with language that frames the insurance sector in a “dark side” context. The victim name swanforlife[.]com is the central focus of the post, and the metadata notes a media pack of 14 images, described only as screenshots or internal documents. A claim URL is indicated on the page, suggesting the attackers provide a public statement or proof, though no URL is shown in the supplied data. The page also includes contact details—such as a Jabber handle and an FTP reference—which are redacted in the provided excerpt. The post date is August 18, 2025; the data does not specify a separate compromise date, so this date is treated as the post date. The victim’s metadata lists India as the country, while the page description references Mauritius, highlighting the kind of geographic ambiguity sometimes seen in leak posts.

In terms of what the post shows and claims, the page identifies swanforlife[.]com as a ransomware victim and references a data-exposure style event, although the field labeled “impact” is not populated in the provided data. The presence of a claim URL implies an accompanying statement or proof, but the actual content is not disclosed here. The media pack consists of 14 image attachments, which appear to be onion-hosted visuals of internal materials; their specific contents are not described in the dataset. The body excerpt also notes redacted contact channels and a fingerprint-like string labeled “TOX,” along with a redacted FTP credential, indicating exposed (though redacted) communications and data access points. No explicit ransom amount or encryption claim is visible in the excerpt, and the dataset does not list downloadable data despite the page’s claim presence.

From a defensive perspective, the page underscores the persistent risk to insurers and financial services firms from ransomware actors who publish stolen data and offer a formal statement via a claim page. The post date remains August 18, 2025, with no separate compromise date provided. Geographic cues show India in the metadata but Mauritius in the narrative description, a discrepancy that should be cross-checked with other threat intelligence sources. PII such as emails and credentials are clearly redacted in the public fields, though the page itself includes references to redacted contact channels. The presence of 14 onion-hosted image attachments and a claim URL suggests the attackers are aiming to publicly document a breach while withholding certain details, a pattern commonly observed in double-extortion campaigns.