Ransomware Group: COINBASECARTEL

VICTIM NAME: BAM

NOTE: No files or stolen information are [exfiltrated/downloaded/taken/hosted/seen/reposted/disclosed] by RedPacket Security. Any legal issues relating to the content of the files should be directed at the attackers directly, not RedPacket Security. This blog is simply posting an editorial news post informing that a company has fallen victim to a ransomware attack. RedPacket Security is in no way affiliated or aligned with any ransomware threat actors or groups and will not host infringing content. The information on this page is fully automated and redacted whilst being scraped directly from the COINBASECARTEL Onion Dark Web Tor Blog page.

AI Generated Summary of the Ransomware Leak Page

On September 28, 2025, BAM is identified as the victim on a ransomware leak page. The leak entry provides minimal contextual data: the victim’s industry and country are not disclosed in the captured fields, and there is no explicit compromise date present. Because there is no separate compromise date available, the key_date is treated as the post date for the leak. The page indicates a claim URL is present, suggesting a negotiation or verification pathway, though the actual URL is not shown in the provided data. There are no downloadable files or images associated with the page; the entry shows zero images and no visible screenshots or documents, and there is no stated ransom amount or encryption status in the snapshot.

The text on the page includes a direct, terse message directed at BAM: “You are fully aware of what we have, yet you’ve chosen not to uphold your end of the agreement. This is unacceptable. If you do not get in touch …” This language aligns with extortion behavior, implying the attackers claim to possess material from a breach and are pressing the victim to contact them to resolve the matter. The body excerpt identifies BAM, but there are no additional details on what was taken, the data types involved, or any ransom demand in the published material. The absence of any images, screenshots, or downloadable data limits the ability to gauge the scope of the incident from the page alone.

Overall, the leak page presents a targeted extortion post with limited public evidence beyond the brief textual threat. The victim’s industry and country are not disclosed in the capture, and no explicit compromise date is provided aside from the post date. The presence of a claim URL indicator suggests ongoing pressure or negotiation, but the exact link is not included in the data. For defenders, this underscores the importance of monitoring for any ransom-related communications and reviewing BAM’s network for signs of breach or exfiltration, even when the page itself offers only a minimal narrative.