[QILIN] – Ransomware Victim: Laloma
![[QILIN] - Ransomware Victim: Laloma 1 image](https://www.redpacketsecurity.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/09/image.png)
NOTE: No files or stolen information are exfiltrated, downloaded, taken, hosted, seen, reposted, or disclosed by RedPacket Security. Any legal issues relating to the content should be directed at the attackers, not RedPacket Security. This blog is an editorial notice informing that a company has fallen victim to a ransomware attack. RedPacket Security is not affiliated with any ransomware threat actors or groups and will not host infringing content. The information on this page is automated and redacted whilst being scraped directly from the QILIN Onion Dark Web Tor Blog page.
AI Generated Summary of the Ransomware Leak Page
On October 19, 2025, a leak post attributed to the ransomware actor group qilin targets Laloma. The entry is framed as a data-leak event and includes a claim URL as part of the evidence that data has been exfiltrated. The page provides limited background on Laloma, with the industry field listed as Not Found in the metadata; the descriptive copy in the leak narrative frames Laloma as a restaurant operator in the Minneapolis–Saint Paul area that emphasizes traditional preparations and fresh ingredients. Three images are presented on the page as visual corroboration, though the excerpt does not describe their contents in detail. The attacker-facing elements in the excerpt include a redacted Jabber address, a TOX hash, and an FTP-like path with a redacted email, indicating typical out-of-band channels used for contact or verification. No ransom amount or explicit data size is disclosed within the visible portion of the page.
From a threat intelligence perspective, the post aligns with common ransomware data-leak patterns: a named victim, a group alias, and multiple image assets used as proof, along with a claim URL intended to anchor the exfiltration claim. The posting date in the dataset is 2025-10-19, and there is no explicit compromise date provided, so this is treated as the post date rather than the initial breach date. The page’s three images serve as evidence, but their specific contents are not described in the excerpt. PII in the attacker contact lines is redacted, with only placeholders for a Jabber address and an FTP path visible; a TOX hash is present as a non-user-facing artifact. The excerpt does not reveal a ransom figure, and no data size is shown, which is typical for leak-page summaries where the presence of a claim URL and accompanying visuals signals a data-leak operation without a disclosed demand in the public text.
Support Our Work
A considerable amount of time and effort goes into maintaining this website, creating backend automation and creating new features and content for you to make actionable intelligence decisions. Everyone that supports the site helps enable new functionality.
If you like the site, please support us on Patreon or Buy Me A Coffee using the buttons below.